I support thoughtful rezoning. When grounded in strategy, zoning promotes predictability, encourages appropriate development, and creates transparency for both the town and prospective developers. Done well, it is one of the most effective tools we have to guide long-term growth.
However, I do not believe the proposal before you is the right step at this time, nor is it sufficiently developed.
Zoning should follow planning. Before adopting a significant overlay, the town should update, solidify, and formally adopt its Master Plan. A current Master Plan provides the framework from which zoning changes should logically flow, ensuring that density, use, scale, traffic, parking, infrastructure, and economic vitality are evaluated holistically rather than in isolation.
As presented, this overlay feels piecemeal. Key considerations—including safety, parking demand, infrastructure, traffic circulation, and overall scale—warrant broader integration within a comprehensive planning effort.
Regarding the proposed hotel, there are practical realities. A 100+ key hotel constructed over existing assets in today’s cost environment is unlikely to pencil out without tax incentives or a public-private partnership, meaning the town would either invest funds or forgo revenue. If the economics are not viable, the zoning change may be predicated on a use that will not materialize.
Even if feasible, a 100+ room hotel is not appropriate for the scale and character of our town. The proposed location, near children and along a vital corridor, raises additional safety concerns.
Zoning decisions shape a town for decades. They should be grounded in an updated Master Plan and evaluated comprehensively. If postponement is not an option, I recommend a vote of no at this time.
Jeff Birenbaum, Carleton Circle