In six weeks, Town Meeting will grapple with the largest single zoning change we’ve ever faced—to be handled in the same way a revision to the parking ordinance would. Those who have concerns about the proposed Belmont Center Overlay district will speak those concerns, standing at a microphone. One by one, members will get their two or three minutes, seeking to understand the validity or veracity of the town’s formidable perspectives and positions. They’ll likely be responded to by a fully unified body of town representatives, and summarily be told their concerns have already been addressed or are unfounded…Next!
Kind of an uneven matchup, no?
Yes, the town has had many information sessions, following just this format. Based on those, they see no need to have a sit-down discussion with qualified, informed, and knowledgeable members of the community in a moderated and expansive panel-based forum.
This overlay is nothing short of eliminating a perfectly enjoyable, warm, and vibrant Belmont Center, with potentially permanent and massive impacts to residents, merchants, and the community. But we are being told, “It will be worth it, trust us.” Vibrancy, equity, and sustainability are in the revised mantra. Unlimited large franchises and densification are now on the table. “Generic” should be added to the list. Good-bye Nick’s Place, hello Jersey Mikes et. al. So far, we’re seeing scant evidence of “worth it” in the financial models.
The town should not hide behind one-sided “information sessions.” A forum would provide a meaningful discussion of the possibility of inherent, substantive flaws and risks, rather than focusing only on well-crafted rewards. A select group would present findings, raise concerns, and ask considered and well-founded questions. In other words, a level playing field. Residents should hear directly from knowledgeable, qualified voices who see things other than through the rose-colored-glasses-only perspective of the Planning and Select Boards.
William Trabilcy, Marlboro Street